-
Website
http://sayanythingblog.com/ -
Original page
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/wells_fargo_apparently_sponsoring_identification_f -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ellinas
1109 comments · 47 points
-
Kenny
669 comments · 37 points
-
Rob
25254 comments · 136 points
-
suitepotato
2719 comments · 17 points
-
carrick
501 comments · 16 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
2 hours ago · 11 comments
-
Extra TARP Money? What Extra TARP Money?
13 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Homophobia Update: A Review of “Falsettos”
10 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Did Sarah Palin Leave College In Hawaii Because Of Racism?
2 days ago · 157 comments
-
Obama To Save/Create More Jobs With Speech Today
15 hours ago · 29 comments
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
Apparently Ralph has comprehension problems. No wonder he disagrees - he doesn't even understand the issue and the arguments!
In any regard Ralph, I'm going to spell it out for you - we are anti illegal immigration. Did you miss that big boy? Here,..I'll bolden and capitalize the important word just for you chief - anti ILLEGAL immigration.
You may now carry on with your ignorant synopsis of topics that in no way describe the parent article.
Illegal immigration, however, is another matter entirely. I don't like to see American businesses adding incentive for foreigners to break out immigration and border security laws.
But hey, if its easier for you to label us all racists rather than, you know, actually discuss the points of the issue then feel free. You certainly aren't the first.
In case you missed it, there was a page 1, Wall Street Journal article on this trend. See: July 8, 2005: Fight against illegal immigration into U.S. officially lost
I never labeled anyone a racist.
My point still applies.
Now you have accused me of NOT showing respect for the law. Just this morning, I saw a can of Pepsi in the fridge. It looked good. I was thirsty. But instead of taking it, I went out and bought my own. I didn't take it because it would be unlawful to take it. Thus, I have shown respect for the law. I have done many other things that show respect for the law.
Now I would like to accuse you of being ignorant.
Why would you make that remark here where it doesn't apply?
If you understood that to be a comment about you personally, then you must consider yourself to be a paranoid radical anti-immigratin fanatic.
You made the first comment and it is obvious who you were making it to Ralph. You can stop your bullshit mind games now.
Now I would like to accuse you of being ignorant.
And I'd like to safely say that you are a stupid asshole Ralph.
Just to reiterate my comment, in this country and in this world, there are challenges, problems, opportunities and impasses. You can sit back and whine and complain about what everyone else is doing. That accomplishes nothing. The other alternative is to devise practical plans to address problems and take advantage of opportunities.
Those clueless paranoid radical anti-immigrant fanatics that whine are accomplishing nothing. In some cases they're actually worsening the problems. Well Fargo, other banks and businesses, and some leaders, however, by their actions, are addressing the challenges and opportunities posed by immigration to the net benefit of society as a whole.
Yes. That started with your first comment which happens to be the first comment.
Those clueless paranoid radical anti-immigrant fanatics that whine are accomplishing nothing. In some cases they're actually worsening the problems.
You're acting the part of clueless dipshit again. We are anti-ILLEGAL immigration. That does not make us "paranoid" or "radical". But ignore that explanation again and continue to insult us and the issue and then cry about the returned insults. It shows us that you have no argument when you can't even properly address the subject at hand.
I repeat myself again, I was not necessarily referring to YOU when referring to the paranoid radical anti-immigration movement. I stated this before very clearly. How many fucking times do I have to say this in order for you to get it through your thick skull? Really! I'd like to know.
Why would you bring it up if it doesn't apply to anybody here?
Why would you say it after Rob was talking about the illegal immigration aspect and how Wells Fargo Bank ends up promoting illegal immigration?
Why would you disagree and then say, "paranoid radical anti-immigration movement is merely a group of annoying gnats, their hateful rhetoric virtually harmless" thereby strongly suggesting, if not stating outright, that Rob and others who disagree with Wells Fargo Bank's actions are the "paranoid radical anti-immigration" people of which you speak?
I stated this before very clearly.
Yes you did. And then you proceeded to insult and miscategorize.
How many fucking times do I have to say this in order for you to get it through your thick skull? Really! I'd like to know.
Get angry that I have been dissecting your facetious logic Ralph. It suits you well. Now insult me again you little prick.
I've been monitoring this thread and have a question for you? It all centers around what appears to be a convenient use of rhetorical (your word) juxtaposition.
Your comment, in verbatim, was:
First, I would strongly agree with your truism, "these people are people". That's not in question. However, their legal immigration status is; the point upon which Rob's post is based on (as is the one I refer to in July 8, 2005: Fight against illegal immigration into U.S. officially lost).
Individuals like Rob and I are not upset that US businesses are "finally realizing that these people are people". We're upset (actually, I'm enraged) because US businesses are accomodating individuals that have not established a legal status (citizenship, green card, visa, etc.) to be in the U.S. to conduct any business; especially in light of 9/11 and the Global War on Terror.
Having supported the actions of Wells Fargo in your first sentence, you then immediately juxtapose the following sentence: Why would you expect that any reader of that comment and sentiment not have it applied to the individuals, like myself, that are against the very position you support - Specifically that, "US businesses finally realizing that these people [illegal immigrants] are people" worthy of being sponsored for identification; identification that our own FBI has characterized as a security threat?
Do you just have an automatic comment response search engine that posts your 'rhetoric' whenever it finds a blog entry with the word 'immigrants' in it and have yet to fine tune it for posts on 'illegal immigrants'?
You're being too cute by half if you expect me to believe that your sentiment is solely directed to anti-immigrants as opposed to anti-illegal immigrants. The very title of Rob's post is "Wells Fargo Apparently Sponsoring Identification For Illegal Immigrants".
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch"
Invite a bunch of 3rd world illegals in, give them the right to vote, LOL, thats America
Banking on illegal immigrants.
You missed the point didn't you....
Who invited the 3rd world illegal aliens into this country? I merely suggested that they use all their energy to fight instead of run from their own governmental problems.
Alas, how can they, when they spend so much of their time making babies, getting drunk, and selling drugs. Hell, why not come to America it's easier to do that here than in their country.
What does it take to get it throught the thick skulls of those who call anti-Illegal immigrants proponents "racist" that we are talking about ILLEGALs. Those who believe illegals should be treated the same as legal immigrants must believe that anyone committing an illegal act should not be punoshed or brought to justice. The argument that illegals are trying to feed their families could be applied to petty theft, robbery or a host of other illegal acts. These acts are illegal because they harm person(s) or society as a whole Illegal immigrants drive wages down and use valuable resources that are needed for leagl immigrant..
If you bank with Wells Fargo, you should take your business elsewhere because they have done more than any bank to help illegal immigrants get banking services, including loans for houses!
http://www.EmbargoWellsFargo.com
and Citibank too