-
Website
http://sayanythingblog.com/ -
Original page
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/weakness_how_long_until_obama_going_to_apologize_to_pirates_who_are_holding -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
-
Top Commenters
-
Popular Threads
You people stink like shit.
Obama's apology tour leads to American's taken hostage and the scumbag liberals claim we're happy about it.
Pretty much typical liberal misdirection.
I'm not happy about it. I'm mad as hell about it.
Maybe the hostages are white...
We do know that they are the people Obama hates since they have jobs and presumably pay taxes.
Coming from Dino that's quite a compliment.
Why are you bothering to read dino, let alone respond to his rantings and ravings?
I'm saying that your disappointment over losing EVERYTHING in 2006 and 2008 has you hoping for disaster and celebrating suffering.
You're awful people. Simply the worst people on the planet. Selfish, greedy, bitter, nasty people. Driven by nothing good.
If, as you claim, real Americans "lost everything" in 2006 and 2008, then you guys are totally responsible for everything now, right? You can't have it both ways, dumb little dinostem.
[quote]You're awful people. Simply the worst people on the planet. Selfish, greedy, bitter, nasty people. Driven by nothing good.[/quote]
Sounds like you on this blog, little dinostem. You are the one constantly spewing hate at real Americans.
They should make a movie about it? I don't get it. Or are you saying that the pirates would just cower and run away at the site of the Marines. That worked real well the last time we were in Somalia didn't it. I think you would end up with 20 civilian coffins and a dozed special ops coffins. If the Navy ships that are patrolling the area had their shit together they would have helicopter gun ships on board to deal with the pirates before they even boarded the container ship. How can a attack go on for four hours and not be strafed by gun fire from something? Sounds to me like the weak sauce is our own military.
You're awful people. Simply the worst people on the planet. Selfish, greedy, bitter, nasty people. Driven by nothing good.
Dino2 on April 8, 2009 at 08:34 am[/quote]
[quote]It's posts like this that make me glad that your kids will suffer for your mistaken political beliefs and habit of voting republican.
Dino2 on April 8, 2009 at 07:39 am [/quote]
Dino and his self analysis.
You could always take it up with the Commander-in-Chief... but I believe he's busy practicing with his new teleprompter. Besides, there is every likelihood that he wouldn't have the faintest idea what you're talking about in any case.
Nice Job Bill Clinton.
I found the secret website that the Obama administration is working with to prepare our response.
http://www.imsorry.com/
Get back to me when Clinton gets 4,000 of our military killed and over 100,000 injured.
[quote]You could always take it up with the Commander-in-Chief[/quote]
The military has been given a task to prevent pirating, an attack on an American ship lasts over four hours with no response from our military before being successful. Does the commander of the operation need his hand held to accomplish his task?
You have an hard time staying on topic, don't you buzzed? Are you trying to claim that anything Bush did makes up for Clinton's mistakes?
RG demonstrates his ignorance of the world. Bush has managed to demonstrate that disorganized towel heads with no mechanized equipment whatsoever can hold off, and kill at will the alleged greatest military force on Earth for six years. No one that is determined, and has a RPG or a Kalishkinov will fear America any more.
robert108 on September 27, 2006 at 02:30 am[/quote]
Maybe you should send a text to the dudes detonating the bombs in Iraq this past week, I don't think they got the memo that we won.
Then you link to your own propaganda as proof that you are correct. What a douche.
It says a lot about them, none of it good.
What, they don't love us because of Obama?
I thought his teleprompter told us that he was going to fix everything.
Clearly violating the pirates' human rights and engaging in torture by throwing them overboard is worthy of Justice Department prosecution.
Quoting statics isn't your strong suit. If you look at [url=http://urbanlegends.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf]Table 5[/url] you will see that over 85% of the deaths under Clinton were from either: accidents, homicide, illness, or self inflicted.
Under Clinton only 135 of the military were killed from hostile action or terrorist attack.
Where as under bush 2,605 were killed from hostile action alone, and that is ONLY through 2006. With that there were tens of thousands of wounded. It is clear that your statics mean nothing upon further inspection.
Buzz, like all leftists doesn't care about people who die from accidents, homicide, illness or self-inflicted.
Why? Because they can't make political hay out of it.
Where as under bush 2,605 were killed from hostile action alone,
Buzz on April 8, 2009 at 10:13 am[/quote]
Being at war, and NOT being at war seems to make a difference.
[quote]Where as under bush 2,605 were killed from hostile action alone[/quote]
I see that you're not including 3,000 innocents that were killed on 9/11
Not in rod's eyes, he implied that being more died under Clinton, that his policy was to blame, which is clearly not the case.
And under Carter in 1980 and 1981 only ONE person in the military died from either hostile action or terrorist attack, ONE.
Now there is re-writing history for you.
Wasn't Ronald Reagan inaugurated in January 1981. Funny you should imply that he was president the entire time.
Funny you should not include the Hostage Rescue debacle that occurred on April 24, 1980. While that was due to an accident it was during an hostile action in a very hostile country.
That is as far back as the Table went in the link. But yea, not that you mention it raygun got 261 blowed up in Lebanon.
and nothing but silence from the Messiah!
Are these the tests that Biden talked about that would make the world know just what Obama is made off?
Well, so far he gets an F on these first two incidents, and the world is laughing
You lie again, little Buzzy. It was Jaime Gorelick, Clinton functionary, who created the "wall of separation" between intel agencies, which prevented the detection of the 9/11 hijackers when they illegally entered the country and trained to fly the airliners into the buildings.
Educate yourself, fool.
I wonder if Hallmark is going to come out with a "America's Sorry" section.
Barry's master plan:
--------------------
1.First days in office blame everything on Bush
2.Say that I did not ask to inherit these problems
3.Go on tour appologizing for being from the US
4.?????
5.Profit
Mark on April 8, 2009 at 10:43 am[/quote]
Hey!!! Can't you see "Milli-Vanilli's" lips moving...and nothing being spoken?
Personally, I'm hoping that obama-turd does something other than apologize for even thinking about the NK missle or that ship being in that particular spot in the open sea.
So....go away. We could bear the pain of your absence.
You people stink like shit. [/quote]
Talk about Shitstains.
Dino2 has said about America,
This guy voted for and loves Obama. Any questions?
This is your odor of preference and experience.
I guess I should cling to my guns and religon.
Only a paranoid, ignorant fool would make a statement like this. Obama has not apologized about anything. He simply told the truth about how the United States has dealt with other countries, including out disdain for European concerns. Do you think that any of this was news to the rest of the world? For over 60 years we have acted as though the world should kiss America's ass and thank God we saved them from the Nazis. We set ourselves up as the self- appointed leader of the free world. If any country was not in lockstep with us, we declared that they were not our allies or at least unappreciative. Are you really ignorant enough to believe that anything uttered by the President encouraged the pirates to attack the U.S. ship? I would wonder why the American crew would be so arrogant as to sail into this area without being heavily armed. That was stupid, plain and simple. Now you want to blame the President for this turn of events. That type of thinking is all too prevalent among conservatives. Ignorance is bliss.
I don't believe it's legal but I can't find a source.
ollie-b is more of a useless fool here, actually...
It isn't 'on the way' to the inaguration like Walter Reed was.
/sarcasm
Clearly violating the pirates' human rights and engaging in torture by throwing them overboard is worthy of Justice Department prosecution.
MAS1916 on April 8, 2009 at 10:11 am [/quote]
I think that your head is full of manure.
By The Whistler on April 8, 2009 at 06:44 am[/quote]
Sure thing Whistler. This whole piracy thing is Obama's fault.
The pirates, having watched Obama on their HDTV's speak and "apologize", right then and there decided to embark their boat and go hijack an American ship.
Your premise is weak, weak, weak.
J.L. on April 8, 2009 at 04:26 pm [/quote]
Until when, do you suggest, should they be kissing our ass?
Don't they have interests of their own,which may be different than those of the USA?
andophiroxia on April 9, 2009 at 08:25 am [/quote]
Here you go! compliments to the Online Dictionary:
prem⋅ise /ˈprɛmɪs/
--noun 1. Also, premiss.[b] Logic. a proposition supporting or helping to support a conclusion. [/b]2. premises, a. a tract of land including its buildings.
b. a building together with its grounds or other appurtenances.
c. the property forming the subject of a conveyance or bequest.
[b]3. Law. a. a basis, stated or assumed, on which reasoning proceeds. [/b]b. an earlier statement in a document.
[b]c. (in a bill in equity) the statement of facts upon which the complaint is based.
[/b]
--verb (used with object) [b]4. to set forth beforehand, as by way of introduction or explanation. [/b]
[b]5. to assume, either explicitly or implicitly, (a proposition) as a premise for a conclusion. [/b]
--verb (used without object)[b] 6. to state or assume a premise. [/b]
I do understand the meaning of a premise. Do you?
I know how stupid you can be, now show me how smart you really are.
robert108 on April 9, 2009 at 08:35 am [/quote]
Until when, do you suggest, should they be kissing our ass?
Don't they have interests of their own,which may be different than those of the USA?
I generally see you posting hyperbole and talking points with faulty reasoning and logic. Also, I don't see you coming up with any arguments or stances of your own. I just see you putting in little "remarks" that lead to nothing.
For instance, what does this have to do with the point at hand?
[quote]
Don't they have interests of their own,which may be different than those of the USA?[/quote]
This is about the fucking pirates doing awful shit to law-abiding people, you dumbass.
[quote]I don't believe it's legal but I can't find a source.
The Whistler on April 8, 2009 at 03:27 pm [/quote]
Whistler. It is not legal to have firearms on board a ship.
Only the ships master(captain) may or may not have a pistol, which must be locked in the ships safe.
andophiroxia on April 9, 2009 at 08:41 am[/quote]
Yes I did!
Indeed he did.
And it will be the only intelligent and cogent thing overcompensatingelinas will post all week long.
Don't they have interests of their own,which may be different than those of the USA?[/b]
[u]This is about the fucking pirates doing awful shit to law-abiding people, you dumbass.[/u]
andophiroxia on April 9, 2009 at 08:41 am [/quote]
The above has nothing to do with the pirates doing awful shit to law-abiding people, you dumbass.
It was a response to JL who posted this:
"Including our disdain for European concerns." I see. The fact that we helped liberate Europe in WW2 (when those most "Europe" of people, the French, did nothing), tear down the Berlin Wall, helped re-build Europe after WW2, and defend them to this day with our troops and a thousand of things i can`t remember shows our "didain" for them? A usefull idiot is what you are.
J.L. on April 8, 2009 at 04:26 pm
I know how stupid you can be, now show me how smart you really are.
I made no such suggestion, faggot! That imagery is all yours. Without us, free Europe wouldn't exist, moron. Eastern Europe owes its present freedom to Ronald Reagan, for destroying the Soviet Union. Your obsession with homo sex is noted, but normal people just want to be shown some respect, and not a closet Muslim apologizing for us. We have nothing to apologize for.
A word of advice: mock the tarbaby which is overcompensatingelinas and move on. He hates that.
robert108 on April 9, 2009 at 08:35 am [/quote]
What do you suggest the Europeans do to repay what they owe us? When is this debt considered repayed?
When has Europe bled for the United States?
[quote]I made no such suggestion, faggot! That imagery is all yours. Without us, free Europe wouldn't exist, moron. Eastern Europe owes its present freedom to Ronald Reagan, for destroying the Soviet Union. Your obsession with homo sex is noted, but normal people just want to be shown some respect, and not a closet Muslim apologizing for us. We have nothing to apologize for.
robert108 on April 9, 2009 at 08:52 am [/quote]
You know damn well what "kissing ass" means. Quit playing word games.
A word of advice: mock the tarbaby which is overcompensatingelinas and move on. He hates that.
Rodney Graves on April 9, 2009 at 08:59 am [/quote]
Or you may, like Rodney Graves has done on several occasions on this blog, threaten me with an ass whooping, or if that does not work resort to ethnic slurs.
When has Europe bled for the United States?
Rodney Graves on April 9, 2009 at 09:01 am [/quote]
Korea comes to mind.
That's true. I remember the comedy gold regarding him and the Delhi/Delphi argument. That was pretty damn funny.
[quote]And it will be the only intelligent and cogent thing overcompensatingelinas will post all week long.[/quote]
True, sad he can't come up with cogent responses on his own, just coffee-talk blather eh?
I'm not a faggot, so, no. I said "they owe us", and you came up with your own imagery out of your own value system.
When someone owes me money and pays it back, or thanks me for the loan, I don't consider that "kissing ass"; I consider it honesty. You reveal yourself by your choice of words, faggot.
robert108 on September 27, 2006 at 02:30 am[/quote]
robert108 on April 9, 2009 at 09:11 am [/quote]
What? Just because you say so?
Why should I believe you when you constantly lie?
Like when you said you would not vote for McCain because he is a shit sandwich?
Then you turn around and eat the shit sandwich by declaring:
I voted for him...
robert108 on November 7, 2008 at 08:41 am
Enjoy your faggotry.
robert108 on June 28, 2008 at 10:40 pm[/quote]
Why should I believe you when you constantly lie?
Like when you said you would not vote for McCain because he is a shit sandwich?
Then you turn around and eat the shit sandwich by declaring:
I voted for him... [/quote]
Lying greek faggot: You're not even intelligent enough to realize that you contradicted yourself there. Besides lying, of course, which you do in every comment here.
robert108 on August 11, 2006 at 1:32 PM [/quote]
[quote]
gop Woman Too Lazy To Learn Chinky Names -rbb[/quote]
Now "gop woman" is name calling?
When his actual headline was:
Given the slur (Chinky) did not occur anywhere in the article blackwaterboob linked, that tasty morsel of racism is all his.
I guess to you, all us "chinks" are the same, realdipshit.