-
Website
http://sayanythingblog.com/ -
Original page
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/the_tobacco_ization_of_alcohol_has_begun -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ellinas
1109 comments · 47 points
-
Kenny
669 comments · 37 points
-
Rob
25254 comments · 136 points
-
suitepotato
2720 comments · 17 points
-
carrick
501 comments · 16 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
3 hours ago · 12 comments
-
Extra TARP Money? What Extra TARP Money?
14 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Homophobia Update: A Review of “Falsettos”
11 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Did Sarah Palin Leave College In Hawaii Because Of Racism?
2 days ago · 158 comments
-
Obama To Save/Create More Jobs With Speech Today
16 hours ago · 29 comments
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
What I have always found baffling (coming from a country where the age limit is significantly lower) is the 21 age for drinking. Several years ago, I went to stay in the US with some friends who I had studied with at college here in the UK. I had just turned 21, so I was OK (although I had to produce my British passport in bars) - but my friends (all rational adults, capable of making decisions for themselves) had to stick to soft drinks.
More importantly, when we were on their college campus, I saw no evidence that a 21 ban was being observed, let alone the least bit effective, and equally the fact that drinking alcohol was illegal (and therefore a bit 'dangerous') only seemed to make it more of a rebellious, youthful thing to do.
Get a fucking grip.
Regards...
Rob's post was about booze advertising, not booze consumers---and that's what my comment was about.
Learn to read, loser.
A bigger crock is that the federal government imposes a national drinking age by blackmailing the states with highway dollars.
What percentage, by the way, is "fairly large"?
(Please remember that "reaching minors more effectively than adults" does not mean "is targeting minors". It means... minors are more easily swayed than adults, especially since adults already have brand preferences, while a not-yet-drinking minor doesn't.)
(And here's a great one from the second link: "The study defined a youth-oriented magazine, however, as one with an under-21 readership of 15.8 percent" ... So it's evil marketing at the underage if the magazine's readership is ... less than 84.2% adults?
And then "The study fell short of directly accusing the alcohol industry of purposely targeting minors". So, evidently, even the activists don't claim, as you do, that the alcohol industry is advertising to the underage market.)
At that time a quote came to mind:
"Scotch Scotch Scotch I love Scotch." - Ron Burgundy
So much for state sovereignity, eh?
Kids drink. That is a simple fact of life. You can pretend otherwise, but by the time they are 13 or 14, they are attending parties where alcohol is being served, or they are getting it themselves.
Differences between alcohol and cigarettes are numerous. Alcohol is not addictive in the sense that nicotine is. Cigarettes don't get you drunk like alcohol does. Alcohol advertising might suffer the same fate, but drinking will not. Ever. Unless other drugs are legalized. Then, maybe.
Here's a summary of the pertinent law: Note this makes the supervising adult liable if he/she allowed a minor to become intoxicated and that minor then caused bodily harm or physical damage to third parties.