-
Website
http://sayanythingblog.com/ -
Original page
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/screw_abstinence -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ellinas
1109 comments · 47 points
-
Kenny
669 comments · 37 points
-
Rob
25254 comments · 136 points
-
suitepotato
2719 comments · 17 points
-
carrick
501 comments · 16 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
2 hours ago · 11 comments
-
Extra TARP Money? What Extra TARP Money?
13 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Homophobia Update: A Review of “Falsettos”
10 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Did Sarah Palin Leave College In Hawaii Because Of Racism?
2 days ago · 157 comments
-
Obama To Save/Create More Jobs With Speech Today
15 hours ago · 29 comments
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
Holding off on having sex until marriage allows a woman to develop a strong, long lasting emotional tie to their husband. This emotional tie generates a strong family which is profoundly important to the development of children.
Regardless of your stance on abortion, wouldn't a better approach be to encourage kids to put off having sex until they're old enough to deal with the consequences of having it? Because the whole abortionist stance is to make abortions "safe, legal and rare," right?
Well they won't exactly be rare if we're "screwing" abstinence.
That there are choices other than sex-for-procreation-only and celibacy?
Here's a nutty idea---do the moral instruction at home or church, and use health class to provide ACCURATE information about their bodies and their choices!
You kids in the back off the car,
put on your pants , step out of the vehicle.
I want to talk to you about abstinace.
Your mother already told you?
Your father already told you?
" yeah but we get carried away"
Who is that other kid in the car?
"That's my brother, he just likes to watch."
I don't have or WANT a family structure exactly like your grandparents had, with a subservient wife pumping out babies for her god, the party, and her husband. Insisting that your model is the best and/or only model for healthy families is prudery at best, bigotry at worse.
Rob:
Firs of all, to "encourage kids to put off having sex until they're old enough" is a one-size-fits-all approach, and sex is so much more complex than that (thank the goddess!)
Secondly, teaching them the truth about birth control and their own bodies is the smart thing to do regardless of your own attitude towards sex.
Finally, I believe abortion should be available on demand, without charge, in complete confidentiality, and without apology. I realize that I'm out of the mainstream on this one---but I remain hopeful that America may someday leave the 18th century and embrace my Highly Evolved World View (tm).
But hey... we live in a country where we can make our own choices and see the results... Considering that the VAST majority of drug addicts, homeless, indigent, etc are from BROKEN families... I think your way sucks.
But you go on preaching that your way is better...
As for the free, confidential, abortion on demand... I would like to see your brain go through the same procedure. What a looser thing to preach... really.
Regardless of what women might want to believe, there are fundamental differnences between the sexes. The object shouldn't be to rid ourselves of them, but to celebrate them. But that's not what the modern feminist ideology teaches. To say that the world would be served by making sex emotionless leads to a total lack of personal responsibility, and an incredible ignorance. While complete abstinence education might be too much of a shelter for kids, merely sending them into the world, not explaining to them that there are both emotional and physical results fror, and a context to sexual intercourse breeds a very similar ignorance--an ignorance that in turn breeds the relativistic mentality, which is far from enlightened. Its downright hedonistic.
And thanks for the link(s)Rob!
-Andrew (I'm signing this because I think I'll still be logged on as "guest")
Please, king Don, tell me what the true nature of a woman is? I beg!!
"Without charge"? Tell me: what in life, besides death, is "without charge"? "Without apology" = without consequence and without morals. At least you're honest.
but I remain hopeful that America may someday leave the 18th century and embrace my Highly Evolved World View ™.
Please. You give yourself way too much credit Don.
That's simply not true, Seth--but since you're still babbling about "a woman's true nature," I don't expect you to be joining the 21th Century anytime soon.
Says the one who denies a woman's true nature.
As much as I like the fantasy of "Free Love", sex for any occasion with anyone who's willing, just for the Sex... I realize that these hormonally charged fantasies would not be beneficial to society. We need to have more married couples raising children. Promoting promiscuity tends to lead to Children... If you don't want 'em, abort 'em is your slogan though, so I guess that's okay... For the girls that don't want to part with their little bundles of cells, they tend to end up raising their children without the aid or support of the father, who is integral to the development of the child.
I do commend your honesty, though... even if I do find your view deplorable.
Well, now I know why you have so much time for blogging---clearly you're not going out on many dates!
After all the blathering y'all have done against what you call 'collectivism,' it turns out you embrace it wholeheartedly...but only for women.
Since I've been Married (5 years next Friday), I tend not to date much.
But thanks for cluing me in on the nature of Women. Your profound insight will help ALL of us!!! You've been great. Thanks for playing!
Seth, did you say that you know about the "true nature of all women" or is Don just making stuff up again?
I'm sure Mrs. Barefoot-and-Pregnant appreciates your vast wisdom very much.
Hahaha. What a fool.
Dude, YOU'RE the guy who claims to know all about the "true nature of all women," Mr. Barefoot-and-Pregnant. I'm sure Mrs. Barefoot-and-Pregnant appreciates your vast wisdom very much.
No it doesn't.
Mrs. Yantiss had two children through another marriage prior to our marriage. She and I have not produced children, and likely will not. She educated me on the female emotional state. The Mrs. is not barefoot... Nor, in the five years we have been married, has she wanted for anything material... Nor have our kids.
I never used the qualifier "ALL", nor would I.
I did ask you to explain this:
but you seem to have refused.
No, I didn't say that... In fact, here's what I said in my first comment
Emphasis added.
Not all Women are bound to emotions just as not all men are bound to logic. In general, it is true, that Women are more emotional and less logical than Men. But, no, there is NO WAY to qualify ALL women with the broad brush of emotional attachment to a sexual partner. I would contend that 90% + do become emotionally attached, however. Just as 90% + of men do not become emotionally attached to their partner during intercourse.
As for this:
It doesn't, really. It implies MOST, but not ALL. I can say that the true nature of animals is to survive... This doesn't discount the Lemming's suicidal tendencies... Some Lemmings are an anomaly to the norm.
As for Don:
Perhaps no woman has ever become emotionally attached to him... including his mother.
Not to be off topic, but the whole lemmings comminting suicide thing is fake. The whole myth was created by Disney. I've seen this from many sources.
From Snopes:
I am happier than ever today and I couldn't imagine my life not being married. I know its different for everyone, but my life would be a mess without my wife and children right now.
The idea that couples marrying young is a bad thing is really a shame in our society.