-
Website
http://sayanythingblog.com/ -
Original page
http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/ron_pauls_record_campaign_made_with_stolen_credit_cards -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ellinas
1109 comments · 47 points
-
Kenny
669 comments · 37 points
-
Rob
25254 comments · 136 points
-
suitepotato
2719 comments · 17 points
-
carrick
501 comments · 16 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
2 hours ago · 12 comments
-
Extra TARP Money? What Extra TARP Money?
13 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Homophobia Update: A Review of “Falsettos”
10 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Did Sarah Palin Leave College In Hawaii Because Of Racism?
2 days ago · 157 comments
-
Obama To Save/Create More Jobs With Speech Today
15 hours ago · 29 comments
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
BTW, the snort was perfect...lol, good job!
;-)
oh, and i'm not even a paul supporter, but this story is just dumb.
At the risk of repeating myself: Contribute to a [b]Presidential campaign[/b] with [b]stolen credit cards[/b]??? Pray tell, give us an [b]example[/b] of where it was done [i]before![/i] (If you can!)
[quote]"The Ron Paul campaign has noticed that dozens, perhaps hundreds of these charges have occurred,"[/quote]Then [b]hundreds[/b] of five dollar contributions would be, like, [i]way more[/i] than $60.00?
And there were [b]36,000[/b] contributors. Do you suppose that [b]all 36,000[/b] of these have been [b]vetted [/b]yet?
Soome of us will wait and see if the other shoe drops...
You are pathetic...
Now, you run along and play while the adults here talk, ok?
The first thing I think of when I hear the name Ron Paul is SPAM. His supporters crawl out of the Internet sewers and use all of the dirty methods hated and suffered by Internet users everywhere.
You are pathetic...
The "man of integrity" (you guys all keep on repeating that like parrots; funny to watch) sure has a lot of dishonest supporters. You won't be able to claim that many of his supporters are good honest people. It's noticed that the "man of integrity" line comes out whenever talk turns to the lack of integrity among his staunchest supporters. Why is that?
But hey - insult us! Ron Paul/Dennis Kucinich won't be winning. The campaign will amount to nothing but a result of a lot of hot air and dirty tricks. Pathetic indeed.
Your strident protestations just reinforce that fact. You love Paul? Go get your own booster blog and hype the man. This blog seems split among Guiliani, Thompson, and the other, real, Repub candidates. That's reality (stark and cruel, ain't it?), and Paul will get no favor treatment here, which is right and just, since the pragmatic readers of SAB don't get any respect at the aforementioned Paulbot blogs. We don't expect any, so we don't get all worked up and get our feelings bruised, like you Paul PomPom Girls do. Grow up.
Sorry Lik, I was typing as you posted, and it looks like I repeated some of your points.
LOL... I automatically wonder who mentioned his name and is causing the recent drove of Ron Paul zombies
;-)
How come every time a story breaks on the Paul Campaign, the [b]paranoid legions[/b] come out to defend their man?
Nobody [b]here [/b]accused Ron Paul of doing anything dishonest!
[quote]so you try to pin something he had nothing to do with on him? [/quote]Would you care to quote [b]exactly[/b] where that took place? Or isn't English your first language?
And certainly the rest of the 36,000 contributors should be audited as well. Reality is, though, that we don't have the evidence (YET) to implicate anyone except for a few credit card thieves.
Yet. The other shoe could drop, but again; it's not dropped yet.
"If you hang out in any of the legitimate forums like Free Republic, some of the opinions are not so different from these illegitimate forums, where the opinions are just a bit over the top."
That doesn't sound very good for Hilobama Thomcromney.
I've never seen any of this spamming, not even a single email out of the hundreds of spam messages I get every day, which seems odd if it's really so ubiquitous. I've certainly never done any of it myself. Either it isn't nearly the problem that some people make it out to be, or...well, there doesn't seem to be another option. Kind of like calling Paul a fraud because someone stole $1000 and added it to the rest of the $4,200,000+ that was contributed it to his campaign on a single day.
If someone is doing those things--and I don't seriously doubt that someone, somewhere has--then they deserve a good kick in the ass, or two or three. You really have to be desparate for an excuse to reject Paul, though, to think that he has anything to do with it. He appears to be an almost unheard of rarity in D.C.: an honest man. That seems almost too good to be true, but I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary yet.
(And why does IE lock up every time I visit this forum?)
Maybe if the [b][i]Rabid Ronbats[/i][/b] would discuss the [i]story[/i] in calm terms, they would see that not everything is an attack on The Doctor!
Do you guys have trouble reading? So many of you have said this falsity every single time we discuss the dishonesty of his supporters.
No wonder you guys got the nickname of "Paulbots". You all dissect an argument in the same false ways.
The sad thing is that you're not even close to why most of us at this site reject Paul. You're going on as if this little episode is a reason. Hint: it's not. But you're not listening.
First of all, it distinguishes him in their minds from all the other candidates in both parties, disparaging them by inference, while glorifying Dr. Paul.
Just as importantly, it gives them something to trumpet and bray about. Paul has spent over 20 years in Congress developing his reputation as a waspish kook, but precious little else. He has no substantive accomplishment to point to, no signature legislation, and no record of having successfully championed any worthy cause or overseen any sort of meaningful or successful enterprise.
In essence, Ron Paul is the champion of the Pat Buchanan wing of the GOP... the far, far right's answer to Dennis Kucinich.
jay c,
There is plenty of reason to reject Paul's candidacy, strictly on the issues and the surreal nature of his policy proposals. Whether he had anything to do with this particular incident or not is largely irrelevant, although a person, any person, who would be a leader of any sort, including President of the United States, had better understand that he/she is ultimately held accountable for the actions of those beneath him. If Ron Paul and his supporters don't comprehend this simple fact, then it is simply one more reason to dismiss his candidacy.
So far not one Paulette has even attempted to do this. Long listings of things he has voted against and opposed. Nothing he has done of a positive, effective nature.
I oppose Paul because he is not a leader, and has done nothing to change or stop any of the issues he prattles on about. And yes, his run is fully intended to put Hillary in the White House, in my opinion.
Wonder why???
What part of Texas did Mr. [i]I educated millions of people that the Federal Reserve was not a government agency*[/i] Paul represent in Congress?
*To be fair, [i]this[/i] dubious claim was made by one of his supporters. That, his "taking the regulatory authority out of the [b]Know Your Customer[/b] regulation", and alerting credit card customers to fraud by his [i]unfamiliar name[/i] are the greatest claims to fame any Ron Paul boosters have been able to come up with to date!
[quote]"He's [Ron Paul} getting money, stolen money," said [Christine]Horton. "Whether he's affiliated with it or not, I have no clue. But it's too fishy."[/quote] It offers no proof. It is merely one person's [i]opinion.[/i] (Much like some proffered here!)
Now, had she said, "If I were a betting woman..." it might have been quote worthy...[i]not![/i]
Thank you
You've been hired by your Mom to clean out the basement! (Small price [i]in lieu of rent[/i] for staying there!)
So what are you going to do with the information you want? You gonna come to my house? You going to harass my employer? (Unlike you, I [i]am[/i] gainfully employed!)
Isn't the problem that you engaged me in a[b] battle of wits[/b] in which you rapidly [b]ran out of ammunition[/b] and [b]ran crying[/b] from the field of battle [b]like a scalded dog?[/b] Thought so.
Get a [i]life[/i], beet farmer!
Thank you
[quote]If anyone knows who this proof person is please post the information. I have been hired to find out who he is and you may be compensated for the information you give.[/quote]
You are not an investigator, and nobody has hired you. If you don't quit pretending as though you're some sort of law enforcement officer I'm going to ban you.
Comment all you want. Say what you want, but this is over the line.
The few posts I made may be enough. You know as well as I do there is no such thing as banning on the net. I could come from anywhere as I have done thus far. I have access to many servers that can be used for investigations.
Out of respect for you I will stop asking for his information but it will come out sooner or later.
I may have to go to Nevada and get the information from the hosting company you use; I hope it does not come to that. There is a legit concern that this person is a government employee and that needs to be looked into. If in fact you know for sure he is not, as well as goon, you should say so now.
You're putting on a rather officious tone, Investigator/Beet Farmer. You do know it's illegal to impersonate a law enforcement officer right?
If I were you, I'd quit pretending right now before you get yourself in more trouble than you want.
I suggest all you here take into account the new laws that have been passed for the internet. You should start asking questions now, you may be surprised what the law has to say about what you can do and what you cannot do on the internet.
[quote]Results 1 - 10 of about [b]142,000,000[/b] for Proof [definition]. (0.19 seconds)[/quote]
Here's your first clue: It's not[i] all about me![/i]
I'll put some coffee on. You're going to be a while...
I'm sure a judge would laugh at that situation.
You can stop now. This is silly.
The [i]movie[/i] "[b]Proof[/b]" (2005)starred Gwyneth Paltrow and Anthony Hopkins. I had a girlfriend once, who thought I [i]looked[/i] a little like Sir Tony.
Hope this helps!
Herr Doktor is already known to hire spambot operators from Europe and China. Are you going to attempt to enforce their laws in America? Doing a bit of in sourcing, are you? Taking hire as an agent of a foreign national perhaps? Your candidate continuously screeches about keeping jobs in America, I guess you are what he means. Not real jobs.
Suggest, investigator, that you stick with the kind of keen observation known to put people in the laogai. :^)
When he jumps in his lime green AMC Gremlin with the "My [i]other[/i] car is a Ferrari", he gets this big [i]adrenaline rush![/i]