Say Anything: Republican Debate Was A Waste Of Time
Bill Mitchell
· 1 year ago
Put yourself in the shoes of an undecided Floridian watching their first debate ever and trying to pick their guy.
Based upon what I saw and the bloggers I have read, although not perfect, Romney came across as the most solid and Presidential. He "looked and sounded" like the President.
For an undecided non-political-wonk-type voter, that is more important than any words being said.
Besides, after the debate, Romney's lead on Intrade for FL shot upto 25 points, so I am guessing the bettors thought he won:
Romney dodged the silly mousetraps twin-tyros Brian-boy and Timmy threw in his direction, including the ridiculous NYT allegation that the other candidates don't LIKE Mitt.
Brian-boy and Timmy apparently are so surrounded by the New York cocoon that they do esteem the opinion of the NYT, demonstrating their compleat ignorance of Republicans. Rudy should have put the Old Grey Hooker into its place.
Romney won by appearing far superior to the two midgets asking questions.
Bat One
· 1 year ago
Brian Williams is graced with boyish good looks, a well cultivated earnestness and a symmetrical pair of ears with nothing in between to keep them apart.
Unlike many of his mainstream media elders, he is only half full of himself. And it takes no effort at all to realize just what the other half is full of.
pparets
· 1 year ago
What [i]we[/i] thought of the Florida GOP debate is irrelevant; we are political junkies. What the average Floridian thought is paramount. Other than a school-marmish [ditch those glasses!] performance by Rudy, they saw an elegant, eloquent Mitt, a witty and charming Huckabee and a relaxed, prepared McCain.
Those of us who frequent SAB will see the candidates and the debate through our pre-concieved - and not always accurate - impressions of them.
Proof
· 1 year ago
[quote]Based upon what I saw [/quote]and [i]Lord only knows[/i] how unbiased you are towards [b]The Romney[/b]! :)
Bill Mitchell
· 1 year ago
Proof,
You know, I would like to do a [b]statistical study [/b]on you.
I would like to measure your:
1. Total [b]number of posts[/b], vs. 2. The number which are [b]just snide remarks [/b]attacking someone else's post, vs. 3. The number where you [b]actually offer something new [/b]and fresh to the discussion.
You call me a [b]ROMBOT[/b] because I like to post about Romney, well you sir, are a [b]TOOLBOT[/b]. You simply cannot post without coming across like a [b]major tool[/b].
Bill Mitchell
· 1 year ago
[u]RASMUSSEN DECLARES ROMNEY THE DEBATE WINNER:[/u]
Romney is himself a tool. He and Bill Clinton share pointers on hair and how to lie to potential constituents about their core ideology. Of course, none of that matters to people like Bill Mitchell, who is a partisan who has consistently been a cheerleader for Romney, and has the annoying habit of bolding every third word. I'd like Bill Mitchell to do a "statistical study" (even though I doubt he would know where to begin) detailing his hackneyed use of bold-faced lies, exaggerations, and propaganda. Romney is a stinky stool sample, and I will not support him. I live in Florida, and have been active politically in my local area. Romney will get no kind word from me. Nor McCain. Nor Suckstobee. The Republican party is dead.
Proof
· 1 year ago
[quote]You call me a ROMBOT because I like to post about Romney, [/quote]No, Bull, I call you a Romneybot, because you [b]spew [i]indiscriminately[/i][/b] in any damn post you please! If you were even [i]moderately[/i] intelligent or something other than a rude and [b]boorish boob[/b], you might refrain from posting your statistical [b]political crap[/b] in [b]non[/b]-political threads. (As you have repeated time and time again!) Even a [i]blind pig[/i] can find an acorn occasionally, so it's good you found a [i]political[/i] thread this time! Also, because in your mindless cheerleading for Romney, you always tout polls that show Romney [i]ahead[/i] as if they were from the [i]lips of God[/i], and ignore [i][b]every[/b] other poll[/i] and dismissing them as if they were totally unimportant.
The [b]funny[/b] part of your [b]mindless spin[/b], is how any [i]individual[/i] pollster, such as Rasmussen, might be an [b]infallible[/b] indicator one day, and then (according to Shill Mitchell) [b]totally worthless[/b] when he shows Romney in a [b]less than favorable[/b] position the next.
Maybe you could honor us with another [url=http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/so_what_about_huckabee/#c232814 ]prediction[/url], Bill? Those are always good for a laugh! [quote]HERE IS MY PREDICTION: Romney will carry Iowa by at atleast 12 points and probably 15 or more. He will carry NH by the same.-BM[/quote]
All Comments
Based upon what I saw and the bloggers I have read, although not perfect, Romney came across as the most solid and Presidential. He "looked and sounded" like the President.
For an undecided non-political-wonk-type voter, that is more important than any words being said.
Besides, after the debate, Romney's lead on Intrade for FL shot upto 25 points, so I am guessing the bettors thought he won:
http://www.intrade.com/jsp/intrade/contractSearch/
Brian-boy and Timmy apparently are so surrounded by the New York cocoon that they do esteem the opinion of the NYT, demonstrating their compleat ignorance of Republicans. Rudy should have put the Old Grey Hooker into its place.
Romney won by appearing far superior to the two midgets asking questions.
Unlike many of his mainstream media elders, he is only half full of himself. And it takes no effort at all to realize just what the other half is full of.
Those of us who frequent SAB will see the candidates and the debate through our pre-concieved - and not always accurate - impressions of them.
You know, I would like to do a [b]statistical study [/b]on you.
I would like to measure your:
1. Total [b]number of posts[/b], vs.
2. The number which are [b]just snide remarks [/b]attacking someone else's post, vs.
3. The number where you [b]actually offer something new [/b]and fresh to the discussion.
You call me a [b]ROMBOT[/b] because I like to post about Romney, well you sir, are a [b]TOOLBOT[/b]. You simply cannot post without coming across like a [b]major tool[/b].
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/...
Just the facts ma'am...
Also, because in your mindless cheerleading for Romney, you always tout polls that show Romney [i]ahead[/i] as if they were from the [i]lips of God[/i], and ignore [i][b]every[/b] other poll[/i] and dismissing them as if they were totally unimportant.
The [b]funny[/b] part of your [b]mindless spin[/b], is how any [i]individual[/i] pollster, such as Rasmussen, might be an [b]infallible[/b] indicator one day, and then (according to Shill Mitchell) [b]totally worthless[/b] when he shows Romney in a [b]less than favorable[/b] position the next.
Maybe you could honor us with another [url=http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/so_what_about_huckabee/#c232814 ]prediction[/url], Bill? Those are always good for a laugh!
[quote]HERE IS MY PREDICTION:
Romney will carry Iowa by at atleast 12 points and probably 15 or more. He will carry NH by the same.-BM[/quote]