-
Website
http://sayanythingblog.com/ -
Original page
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/obama_the_second_biggest_recipient_of_fannie_mae_freddie_mac_money -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ellinas
1109 comments · 47 points
-
Kenny
669 comments · 37 points
-
Rob
25254 comments · 136 points
-
suitepotato
2720 comments · 17 points
-
carrick
501 comments · 16 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
3 hours ago · 12 comments
-
Extra TARP Money? What Extra TARP Money?
14 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Homophobia Update: A Review of “Falsettos”
11 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Did Sarah Palin Leave College In Hawaii Because Of Racism?
2 days ago · 158 comments
-
Obama To Save/Create More Jobs With Speech Today
16 hours ago · 29 comments
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
Seems a bit unethical if you ask me.
[quote][/quote]
<img src="http://i37.tinypic.com/x1k32u.jpg" border="0" alt="Image and video hosting by TinyPic">
[quote]In John McCain's America, any politician who accepts a large contribution or gift from a donor, and then takes steps consistent with the donor's interests -- even though there is no legal quid pro quo -- is corrupt.
Well, then, by his own standard, McCain is corrupt.
McCain was one of the so-called "Keating Five" senators.
He was investigated by the Senate Select Committee on Ethics in 1991 regarding the acceptance of favors from Lincoln Savings & Loan Association (Lincoln) and its owner, Charles H. Keating, Jr.
Simply put, the issue was whether McCain and the other senators used their official positions to attempt to pressure Federal Home Loan Bank Board officials to go easy on the troubled institution. Eventually Lincoln went bust, costing depositors and taxpayers millions.
In its final report (November 20, 1991), here is what the Senate Select Committee on Ethics concluded about McCain's conduct:
[url=http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1955596/posts]"Mr. Keating, his associates, and his friends contributed $56,000 for Senator McCain's two House races in 1982 and 1984, and $54,000 for his 1986 Senate race. [/url][/quote]
From RB Boobie's link:
[quote]The Committee concludes that Senator McCain's actions were not improper nor attended with gross negligence and did not reach the level of requiring institutional action against him.[/quote]
[quote]Alan Cranston (D-CA)
Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ)
John Glenn (D-OH)
John McCain (R-AZ)
Donald W. Riegle (D-MI)[/quote]
All those "D"s will keep it from becoming an election item in the MSM
mccains biggest donor is the PAC, its individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families of Merrill Lynch.
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?c....
should we make negative associations from that also?
Runs off weeping.
/Sarcasm
You mean NOBAMA?
[quote]McCain, John S AZ R $21,550 $0 $21,550 [/quote]
Why are you keeping this a secret?
/moron
So McCain took 1/6th the money from Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac that Obama did. Big deal.
How many former Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae executives are now working for OBama? Or did work for OBama before The One threw them under the bus when they became politically inconvenient?
Riddle me that.
Now, THAT'S CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN! Heh.
How many Freddie and Fannie execs are working for McCain?
How many Freddie and Fannie execs are working for McCain?
watashiwa on September 16, 2008 at 10:05 am[/quote]
NONE
But...when you look at Obama's economic advisers, the guys he has counted on from day one and who have raised him a ton -- and I mean a ton -- of money: [b]Franklin Raines [/b]and [b]Jim Johnson[/b], you realize that both of them are waist to neck deep in the mortgage scandal.
Both Raines and Johnson have served as CEO of Fannie Mae, with Raines taking over from Johnson. [b]Both are key political and economic advisers to Obama. [/b]
http://strategicthought-charles77.blogspot.com/...