-
Website
http://sayanythingblog.com/ -
Original page
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/milk_does_a_body_bad_say_scientists -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ellinas
1109 comments · 47 points
-
Kenny
669 comments · 37 points
-
Rob
25254 comments · 136 points
-
suitepotato
2720 comments · 17 points
-
carrick
501 comments · 16 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
3 hours ago · 12 comments
-
Extra TARP Money? What Extra TARP Money?
14 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Homophobia Update: A Review of “Falsettos”
10 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Did Sarah Palin Leave College In Hawaii Because Of Racism?
2 days ago · 157 comments
-
Obama To Save/Create More Jobs With Speech Today
15 hours ago · 29 comments
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
Also, my nephew was very sickly when he was a youngster. So skinny and so frail. So the doctor recommended whole milk as part of his diet to help him get healthier, and it did help quite a bit. He's still pretty skinny, but he's also a starter on the high school basketball team.
So, anectdotal evidence to be sure, but I don't think anyone should stop drinking milk over this.
He said the same thing about Soda. So which is worse Dave? Why don't you focus on the evils of Coca Cola and Pepsi first, since last time I checked, the reason we are called mammals is the "mammory glands" that lactate and produce... what the hell do they produce again? Perhaps milk from cows is not as healthy as milk from say, YOUR MOM (not yours specifically but any hypothetical mom since I have never sampled your mom's milk--well except that once), but it sure is healthier than a can of Coke.
And before you ween us off the dairy teet, you might want to check and see if babies and children have been drinking milk since, oh, say the time when they started calling us mammals.
You can get a heck of an argument either way on dairy. Most non-caucasians can't take it after about age 5 very well. Many caucasians cannot, either. On the other hand, the balance of minerals found in milk matches that in bones--so at least for children, it's ideal.
There are any number of other arguments based on protein leaching, alternative sources, and exercise--which has far more to do with bone density than diet, for what it's worth. Use your bones and they grow stronger. Sit on your duff like I'm doing now and they weaken, no matter what your diet.
So is dairy necessary? No, but keep your cotton-pickin' hands off my Breyer's! :^)
Milk may contain calcium, but it also contains a lot of fat (good recommendation for the skinny kid to drink it).
Here's some more annecdotal evidence: did you ever notice that fat people - especially kids - drink a lot of milk? I used to work in a grocery store where I saw fat people buying rediculous amounts of milk, and I was also in a boy scout troop where I watched fat kids guzzle milk like water.
In addition, humans are the only animals that drink the milk of another (cows), and we're the only ones that drink it beyond infancy.
Like the others, I'm no expert on the subject, but that's just something to think about.
This is the problem with correlation studies: what is the causation? Did higher calcium intake cause these women to have bone density loss or could it be that their doctors told them to take more calcium after they started having bone fractures?
A baby needs a lot of fat for brain development, but after that...?
Once my kids hit two, I cut them down to one glass a day. They seem healthy to me!
One of my key libertarian beliefs is that the free people making free choices (ie, not the government) is all that is needed for unethical companies to go out of business.
For example, if Wal-Mart wanted to start hiring 10-year-olds to stock their shelves and pay them 10 cents an hour, I wouldn't want the government to tell them they couldn't. Why? Because it wouldn't be necessary. Consumers--the free market--would stop shopping at Wal-Mart, crippling their child-labor industry. The free market will have done its job.
That's all I'm saying abou the dairy industry. The liberal perspective would be for the government to intervene and shut them down. The libertarian perspective (at least, the animal welfare libertarian perspective) would be to hope enough people turn vegan to make dairy farms unprofitable, and thus close down.
I'm sure McDonalds wants Burger King to go out of business, because that will increase McDonalds' sales, but I highly doubt you'd call McDonalds liberal, would you?
Until other species manage domestication, however, this is unlikely to occur.
(My point being that "humans are the only animal that..." is no real argument for or against whatever it is we uniquely do.)
I don't care about milk drinking, but I do care about cheese. Sweet, delicious, life-giving Cheese, proof of God's existence and benevolence...
Any of you that have ever drank fresh dairy milk can tell the difference.
So, then what Maryland did was wrong by your standards? Where are you at crusading against the evils of the Maryland decision on Walmart. Get your libertarian buddies together and stop these fools in charge of government form harming Walmart.
You see, I wouldn't, with the belief that if enough people followed suit slavery would end because it would simply become unprofitable.
I apply that exact same mindset to the dairy industry.
For this reason I stopped drinking milk after my family moved to the US. After drinking fresh milk from my grandfather's cattle that my grandmother had pasturised at the kitchen stove the stuff in your average American grocery store tasted like dirty water.
I was always suspicious of the dairy industry so enthusiastically proclaiming that their product was all that and a bag of chips. What else were they going to say about it, "Our stuff's really not that good for you but please drink it any way?"
"I don't care about milk drinking, but I do care about cheese. Sweet, delicious, life-giving Cheese, proof of God's existence and benevolence..."
Don't forget butter. Sweet, salty, homemade butter, mmmm...
It just doesn't work that way.