DISQUS

Say Anything: Michelle Obama's Racist Views

  • pparets · 1 year ago
    interesting and provocative post, Neiman.
  • Lestat · 1 year ago
    WHITE POWER!!!!
  • realitybasedbob · 1 year ago
    Lawdie Lawd, Neiman shonuf gunna hav hisself some hardtimes ifen a colored boy done gits de votes teh be de prezdent. Lawd hav mersee.

    An a colored woman gonna be de furst lady...Oh Lawd some chainges a comin
  • realitybasedbob · 1 year ago
    rbb what that a personal attack?
  • realitybasedbob · 1 year ago
    ya know, it just might have been...
  • Proof · 1 year ago
    The trolls are talking to themselves again!
  • robert108 · 1 year ago
    Even with the MSM coverup, Barack and Michelle stand out as separatist, skin color racists, with no good intentions for what they regard as "White America". Why would we want to elect a President who we know, going in, has no intention of representing all Americans?
  • pparets · 1 year ago
    ummm.... because some here think it might be better than electing John McCain?
  • pparets · 1 year ago
    ummm.... because some here think it might be better than electing John McCain?
  • likwidshoe · 1 year ago
    Wow. You really get a sense of where one of our resident troll's mind is at reading that garbage. It's a window into the way he thinks and a response that betrays the fact that he can't engage with the points that Neiman's post brought up.

    This one fancies himself a "liberal".
  • robert108 · 1 year ago
    I would rather have a good candidate to vote for, rather than a choice between varying degrees of liberalism. I've said this a few times before, but I guess it needs repeating.
  • realitybasedbob · 1 year ago
    Wow, such harsh criticism from a drug addicted raver.


    r-108 are you a LaRouche man?
  • pparets · 1 year ago
    robert108: [quote]I've said this a few times before, but I guess it needs repeating.[/quote]

    And that would be... why?

    Because if you say it once, the rest of us should quickly fall in line?

    We are errant students in need of your constant tutorials?

    Disagreeing with any of your overblown pronouncements requires that we be punished by hearing them again and again?

    Methinks you take yourself [i]way[/i] too seriously.
  • pparets · 1 year ago
    robert108: [quote]I've said this a few times before, but I guess it needs repeating.[/quote]

    And that would be... why?

    Because if you say it once, the rest of us should quickly fall in line?

    We are errant students in need of your constant tutorials?

    Disagreeing with any of your overblown pronouncements requires that we be punished by hearing them again and again?

    Methinks you take yourself [i]way[/i] too seriously.
  • docdave · 1 year ago
    [quote]I would rather have a good candidate to vote for, rather than a choice between varying degrees of liberalism. [/quote]Ain't nobody perfect, not even you or me. Anyhow peoples political views change sometimes as the political environment changes. Certainly the liberalism of today is a far reach from the liberalism 40-50 years ago. As for myself, I voted for Democrats (JFK, LBJ, etc.) for many years then switched to libertarians because of how the government is eroding our freedoms and then left them to be more or less independant when they (the libertarians) became anti-war, anti-Bush.

    Today I will definitely vote for McCain if only because I fear what will happen to our country if Clinton or Obama are elected.
  • robert108 · 1 year ago
    [quote]Methinks you take yourself way too seriously.[/quote]

    Coming from you, that's funny! You get very serious whenever anyone voices any disagreement with McCain.
    Attacking me personally won't make McCain any more attractive to real Republicans.

    dd: We're a very long way from perfection, bud.

    [quote]Today I will definitely vote for McCain if only because I fear what will happen to our country if Clinton or Obama are elected.[/quote]

    I'll probably have to settle for that, as well. A sad commentary.
  • docdave · 1 year ago
    [quote]I'll probably have to settle for that, as well. A sad commentary.[/quote]Ain't life a bitch, rbb!!
  • docdave · 1 year ago
    I'm losing it - my last comment should have gone to r108 - duh.
  • likwidshoe · 1 year ago
    "realitybased"bob - why don't you live up to your namesake? The sad part is that you don't even attempt to.

    Go ahead and lie about me. It does nothing but destroy your credibility.
  • robert108 · 1 year ago
    Ain't life a bitch? I guess you can look at the situation that way, which is, IMO, the road to hopelessness and defeat. No one succeeds by giving up, so we conservatives need to keep after McCain to at least try to live up to his bullshit claim to be "a proud Reagan conservative". Without constant pressure, he will default to his usual condition of pandering to the Dems.
  • realitybasedbob · 1 year ago
    pp are your internets slow today too?
  • realitybasedbob · 1 year ago
    [quote]Wow, such harsh criticism from a drug addicted raver. [/quote]

    [quote][url=http://sayanythingblog.com/readers/entry/salvia_watch_two_more_states_and_one_city_act_against_the_plant_and_north_d]Go ahead and lie about me. It does nothing but destroy your credibility. [/url][/quote]

    Deny if you want,lik, but it would only take a few minutes to look back to find your comments about being a raver.

    Not that I care about that, I just want you to know that I know you are being less than truthful.
  • likwidshoe · 1 year ago
    I wouldn't call six experiences over a year ago as "addicted", but whatever. As for my raver days, that ended seven years ago.

    Not that I care about that, I just want you to know that I know you are being less than truthful.

    You're an idiot just looking for a cheap insult.

    What are you, in your early 50's?

    Heh.
  • docdave · 1 year ago
    [quote]What are you, in your early 50's? [/quote]
    At least mentally, rbb is an adolescent.
  • Bat One · 1 year ago
    For anyone interested in the truth about Mrs. Obama's senior thesis, it is available [url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8642.html]here[/url] in 4 parts as separate .pdf files.

    From what I can determine from a merely cursory reading, Neiman's take is largely correct.

    Realtitybasedbob's attempt at verbal caricature would be insulting on any of several levels, but this is hardly the time to start taking him seriously in any case.
  • Chief RZ · 1 year ago
    Bat One, Neiman. One can come to just one conclusion. She has racist ideas. The only question is, will she or can she change? I am so glad that the internet is available so that The Truth can come out!
    robert108: skin color racists ? If you get a chance elaborate please.
    [quote]Why would we want to elect a President who we know, going in, has no intention of representing all Americans?[/quote]
    Exactly.
  • Proof · 1 year ago
    [quote]Realtitybasedbob's attempt at verbal caricature would be insulting on any of several levels, but this is hardly the time to start taking him seriously in any case. [/quote]Heh.
  • robert108 · 1 year ago
    [quote]robert108: skin color racists ?[/quote]

    People who judge and generalize based on skin color. Even in the "black community", lighter skinned individuals are considered more attractive and more intelligent than darker ones. Barack is light-skinned, and Michelle is not only light, but has Caucasian facial features. When you get to Colin Powell, the paradigm really breaks down.
  • pparets · 1 year ago
    rbb: [quote]pp, are your internets slow today too?[/quote]

    Slow!! Linking to SAB this afternoon was like trying to connect to the mind of a liberal!! :)

    Rob really needs to replace that Commodore Computer he uses as a server.
  • Chief RZ · 1 year ago
    robert108. OK. Good explanation. I think I remember some discussions on this some decade ago. I thought it was passe“ but I guess not. Was that her problem? What a shame to waste your life on the color of your skin, especially since so many people do not regard it as a problem. I do think that certain peoples use their skin color as a crutch or an excuse when they do not get a job or a husband that they wanted. I also think that it is also used like a "get out of jail free card"
    I had such optimism for the US back in the 1970s, but I guess all that "equality" stuff that was coming out of the NAACP was a lie.
  • docdave · 1 year ago
    [quote]but I guess all that "equality" stuff that was coming out of the NAACP was a lie. [/quote]yep, all equality stuff from where ever it originates is a lie. People were created to be unique not equal. Only identical machines (robots) are equal.
  • pparets · 1 year ago
    Chief RZ: [quote]I had such optimism for the US back in the 70's[/quote]

    Well, we all did. But the leaders of the black community back then morphed into professional victim advocates because that's where the [Fed] money was.. and still is!

    WE have no one to blame but ourselves because - with the best of intentions - we put those programs in place.

    Net result? Increased hostility. Increased violence. Increased illiteracy. Escalating illigitimate birth-rates. Ghetto public housing destroyed. An anti-white, anti-female, anti-American Hip-Hop culture.

    Lesson learned.
  • ollie-B · 1 year ago
    Neiman> If you can't verify veracity of these statements, why are you putting this smut out there?
  • Neiman · 1 year ago
    [quote]Neiman> If you can't verify veracity of these statements, why are you putting this smut out there? [/quote]

    I simply said I could not confirm every word to be exactly accurate, not that I did not rapidly check on the thesis itself, and I just wanted to leave room for any errors in my reading.

    This need not require much investigation, Michelle has made it abundantly clear she was never proud of this country until people started voting for her colored husband. Both of them have associated with anti-white racists like Wright all their lives and they appear to have many racist views.
  • watashitwad · 1 year ago
    Yeah, there is NO WAY to confirm she wrote this racist 'smut'. Surely not by clicking [url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8642.html]this link[/url] and downloading her actual thesis and reading her racist 'smut' for yourself.
  • Lyn · 1 year ago
    A good post. Another glimpse at what the Obamas - both of them - are really like. And you won't find it on the front page of a newspaper nor on a big network show.

    A couple of things piss me off about this Michelle Obama paper. First, if her thesis is considered critical writing at Princeton then the White and Asian kids at Princeton need to get their money refunded. (Blacks like Michelle Obama don't pay to go to Princeton so they're not out anything.) Second, this reminds me of the comment she made about 2 months ago - finally she's not ashamed or embarassed to be American. Still pissed about that. Last, Barack and Michelle Obama are anti-White anti-American fanatics and people still don't see the danger.

    Don't let Barack convince you otherwise. Twenty years of worshipping with the mullah Rev. Wright under his fanatical mentoring. And Michelle Obama and her defining thesis - it's racist how else can you take it?

    These 2 can't be allowed into the White House.
  • Howard · 2 months ago
    Some employees are simply irreplaceable. Take Michelle Obama: The University of Chicago Medical center hired her in 2002 to run "programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer recruitment, staff diversity and minority contracting".

    In 2005, the hospital raised her salary from $120,000 to $317, 000 nearly twice what her husband made as a Senator.

    Oh, did we mention that her husband had just become a U.S. Senator? He sure had. And that he immediately requested a $1 million earmark for the UC Medical Center, in fact?... You betcha by golly... He surely did. Way to network Michelle!

    But now that Mrs. Obama has resigned, the hospital says her position will remain unfilled. How can that possibly be??? Especially if the work she did was vital enough to be worth $317,000?

    Oh, by the way, let me add that Michelle's position was a part time, 20 hour week job at $317,000.00 per year !!

    "IN GOD WE TRUST!!"--we better because you sure can't trust your elected officials.

    The Democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.

    Thomas Jefferson