-
Website
http://sayanythingblog.com/ -
Original page
http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/dont_just_blame_the_feds -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
ellinas
1109 comments · 47 points
-
Kenny
669 comments · 37 points
-
Rob
25254 comments · 136 points
-
suitepotato
2719 comments · 17 points
-
carrick
501 comments · 16 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
2 hours ago · 11 comments
-
Extra TARP Money? What Extra TARP Money?
13 hours ago · 41 comments
-
Homophobia Update: A Review of “Falsettos”
10 hours ago · 21 comments
-
Did Sarah Palin Leave College In Hawaii Because Of Racism?
2 days ago · 157 comments
-
Obama To Save/Create More Jobs With Speech Today
15 hours ago · 29 comments
-
TSA Puts Secret Security Manual On-line
Do try to keep up...
So you're saying that Bush SHOULD "be held accountable for appointing the idiotic Michael Brown to the head of FEMA," but that Bush SHOULD NOT be held accountable for anything Brown did or did not do.
That's after you've made it quite clear that since Nagin deserves SOME of the blame for this clusterfuck, Bush therefore deserves NONE of the blame.
Manoman...not only is the White House passing the buck, they got you maintaining that buck-passing is a good and noble thing.
In Bush's world, "accountability" and "responsibility" are strictly for underlings and suckers.
I mean, one person really can't be this delusional and this dumb, can he?
I'm suggesting that "The Buck Stops Here"---or that it should, anyway.
Why y'all feel this pathological need to protect and defend Dubya at all costs, no matter what, is beyond me.
Haven't there been earthquakes in California? When that happens does California just sit and whine until someone does their job for them?
When the islamists attack in 2001 did New York city give up until the Feds could come in?
What a concept. I'm sure you've even engaged in it when it's been politically expedient.
Title of the post: Don't JUST Blame The Feds
What, exactly, did you extrapolate?
Learn to read bucko.
They had it coming.
We could lure all the inhabitants back, fill the bowl with gasoline and incinerate them. Then we could build a pillar of salt with their ashes.
Where was the Prince while this was happening?
Projection. Why you feel this pathological need to tar and feather Bush at all costs, no matter what, is beyond us.
WOOF said, They had it coming.
We could lure all the inhabitants back, fill the bowl with gasoline and incinerate them. Then we could build a pillar of salt with their ashes.
Where was the Prince while this was happening?
Is that what you really get out of the article? Geeze WOOF. No wonder you disagree with us so much. You don't understand what is being said.
The whole federal response is being scapegoated as documented here: Looking for holes in this thesis on the so-called lack of federal response in New Orleans
You only have to contemplate the idea of New Orleans flooding for about 20 minutes before you figure out that the local and state governments would not be able to handle it by themselves. All the crap about who does what and where is the command center and how do we coordinate should have been worked out in advance IN THE PLAN!
The Bush administration seems content to believe in it's almighty power to just run things by the seat of their pants. "We'll just invade Iraq and work out the details later." "Yeah, New Orleans may flood but we'll just wait till the Governor figures out she has to fill out form 2342422-J before we move in to help.
The Feds are the ones with the resources. The locals are the ones who got flooded out! The President is the one who can cut through the red tape and get things done immediately. Too bad he couldn't have cut his vacation short a few days earlier. Or maybe he could have left some adult supervision in D.C. while he was out of town.
Yeah, I mostly blame the President and his administration.
What's the point now. The mayor of New Orleans is the mayor. We're not going to have a recall election next month. Same goes for the Gov. Still I don't feel sorry for them since they are the ones that largely started it.
Let's get things cleaned up and in a month or two have a complete audit and review. If crimes were committed (misappropriation of Homeland Security funds for example) then their should be manslaughter charges filed. If people did things wrong than let's settle that when all of the facts are known.
The most important thing to happen is to find out how we can do things better.
On the other hand as long as the lefties blame the righties the righties almost have to fire back to defend themselves. I suppose you could say it goes the other way, but the first quotes were blaming the feds.
The fact is the federal intervention saved a lot of lives. Maybe it could have saved more. But this is the first time I've ever had a rescue effort subjected to any high level of criticism.
You still believe that Presidents have real vacations? That he's not doing work while on "vacation"?
Yeah, I mostly blame the President and his administration.
It's easier than laying the blame where it belongs.
It's so much easier to just blame the President.
The only way to end nanny state is to let the city and state due with it own problem. The president is wasting his time with this small shit that state and local government should be dealing with. So yes, let NO go to hell.
It not the president problem so it can't be his fault. FEMA do thing by the book, money was assign and emergency supply line up for state to used after Katrina hit. If the state and local government can get they act together to used that help, tough. Prove other wise or get out. I don't care how may people die, its still not the president or Federal government job to make sure every cities and town work out a plan incase of a desaster. That people die natural disaster is terrible.
FEMA should not have exist, it have no business existing. State government and local government are responsible to local emergency and be financially prepare to deal with them. The Federal government should stay out of it. The only lesson that can be drawn from this is that the federal is over expose in an area where it can only lose politally and financially, and where it is not constitutional bond to expend the capital.