DISQUS

suitepotato · 8 months ago

Are we surprised? The current administration is the embodiment of those elitist libtards who stonewalled any action on Nicaragua and the rest of the Soviet satellites and only exacerbated the Cold War by showing contemptible weakness until Reagan showed up and even then acted as if they were paid spokesmen for the Communist Party.

Neiman · 8 months ago

A question occurs to me on this subject: I wonder how many of us todau, even among so-called conservatives, would risk their own lives and that of their family, loved ones, to oppose tyranny and fight for liberty?

Hawk · 8 months ago

[quote]I wonder how many of us todau, even among so-called conservatives, would risk their own lives and that of their family, loved ones, to oppose tyranny and fight for liberty?[/quote]If the enlistment rate of the people on this site is an indication, not very many.

Bat One · 8 months ago

[quote]If the enlistment rate of the people on this site is an indication, not very many.[/quote]

Hawk,

Really!? And your basis for this is what exactly, counselor?

Hawk · 8 months ago

You guys claim that Iraq and Afghanistan are about fighting against tyranny and for liberty, yet not very many here volunteered.

Like I said, not very many.

docdave · 8 months ago

[quote]You guys claim that Iraq and Afghanistan are about fighting against tyranny and for liberty, yet not very many here volunteered.[/quote]Not very many? Do you know anyone who has? Do you know who amoung us are eligible? Do you know who amoung us have already served?

You really don't have a clue do you?

Bat One · 8 months ago

Hawk,

So... challenged, you immediately start to back down?

Your "conclusion" was crap to begin with, having no factual basis whatsoever.

Bat One · 8 months ago

Actually, Hawk, your pitifully self-serving remark couldn't have been more ill-timed if you had tried, considering the sacrifices made by Neiman [i]and[/i] his family in defense of freedom from tyranny.

Fact is, you probably owe the man an apology for your boorish, thoughtless comment.

robert108 · 8 months ago

It's not a "claim", Hawk, it happens to be the truth. We freed the Afghanis from the murdering Taliban and freed the Iraqis from the murdering Saddam. It's a fact.

Hawk · 8 months ago

[quote]So... challenged, you immediately start to back down?[/quote]When did I back down? I didn't say none, I said not very many.

[quote]Not very many? Do you know anyone who has? Do you know who amoung us are eligible? Do you know who amoung us have already served?
You really don't have a clue do you?[/quote]I believe there are quite a few here between 18-45 who could be members of the guard. There are a few here who have fought, but not very many.

docdave · 8 months ago

[quote]I believe there are quite a few here between 18-45 who could be members of the guard. There are a few here who have fought, but not very many.[/quote]If you're so sure how about some names.

Hawk · 8 months ago

[quote]If you're so sure how about some names.[/quote]

Rob Port

Rodney Graves · 8 months ago

chickenhawk confuses one with many.

Try again, chickenhawk,

docdave · 8 months ago

[quote]I believe there are quite a few here between 18-45 who could be members of the guard[/quote]Imagine, one is 'quite a few'! You must of failed math.

Hawk, how about you and some of your other lefty friends like rbb, han and dino? I'm sure that some of them fit your military dodging assertion.

Hawk · 8 months ago

[quote]I'm sure that some of them fit your military dodging assertion.[/quote]They don't see the war as fighting for freedom from tyranny or liberty so they are not hypocrites.

How old are you DocDave, maybe I will add you to the list.

Rodney Graves · 8 months ago

chickenhawk,

If you have to ask, you have no business asking.

Rodney Graves · 8 months ago

chickenhawk,

And as previously noted, we won despite the left's efforts.

docdave · 8 months ago

[quote]They don't see the war as fighting for freedom from tyranny or liberty so they are not hypocrites.[/quote]You and your kind are hypocrits because you would say the same thing for any war. You say that because really you are cowards and would not consider serving under any circumstances.

Anyway your comment did not say anything about war. You wrote [quote]I believe there are quite a few here between 18-45 who could be members of the guard[/quote]

Your list is still less that 'quite a few' which means you were just blowing smoke out of your ass and are too dishonest to admit it.

Rodney Graves · 8 months ago

docdave,

Why yes:

...you were just blowing smoke out of your ass and are too dishonest to admit it.

is a trait shared by eunuchized, overcompensatingelinas, blackwaterboob, and dino (or have I forgotten any of our truth challenged leftards?)...

Hawk · 8 months ago

[quote] You say that because really you are cowards and would not consider serving under any circumstances.[/quote]I did serve? How about you?

Rodney Graves · 8 months ago

chickenhawk,

Then you won't mind sharing your DD-214, will you?

Hawk · 8 months ago

[quote]Then you won't mind sharing your DD-214, will you?[/quote]DD-214 is considered a valid form of ID. No I am not going to post it on the web. Nor will I post my birth certificate, drivers license or passport.

If you have any questions about my service, ask them.

docdave · 8 months ago

[quote]I did serve? How about you?[/quote]Bully for you. As for me, I volunteered for the draft when I was 18 (yes, I am that old) but was 4Fd because of a previously not detected heart murmur. After I graduated from college I worked in the defense industry and for 2 years was a civilian instructor in a Naval school.

Your list still only contains a single unconfirmed entry.

Rodney Graves · 8 months ago

Let's recap:

Chickenhawk throws out the chickenhawk card in the third comment on an article about the Obama administration's decision to not grant political asylum to a young woman who appears to have just cause to fear for her life.

Chickenhawk, when challenged on his bald assertion, chickenhawk further generalizes.

When challenged on that, he names the host of this blog as what he apparantly considers to be a chickenhawk.

Challenged again. chickenhawk who posts under an untreaceable alias, claims to be a veteran.

When challenged for proof, he demures.

What a chickenshit is our purveyor of the chickenhawk meme.

Rodrigo Peñalba · 7 months ago

Hello, I'm Rodrigo from Nicaragua.

I have read the story about this supposed political refugee, and there is no mention of her in any local media besides her own website.

Not even La Prensa or Canal 2, two opossition media in Nicaragua have published anything about here.

Also, if you live in Nicaragua you will know by Auliliadora's own words that her story is not true o verificable.

For example, she says she was in two marches that ended in violent protests. I'm not excusing the sandinista supporters of their own behaviour, but the photos and youtube videos Auxiliadora posts on her website are from different days and from different cities.

The sandinistas's pictures, which are real and scary by themselves, does not prove she was hunted or chased by the mobs of CPCs.